Live Free or Die Alliance

New Hampshire's Virtual Town Hall

"Live Free or Die: For Death is not the worst of evils." From the lips of General John Stark, immortalized as our state motto "Live Free or Die," personally means a lot to me. It's something I have believed in whole-heartidly, since I could perform the funcion of reason. As it happened, we will never know the absolute truth about the birth of this fine nation, but one thing is certain, Live Free or Die was the backbone of that American Dream. . . and it breaks my heart to see the state that took on the mantre, slowly let it disipate into nothing.

Slowly but Surely New Hampshire is transitioning into New Massachusettes. Being born and raised in Portsmouth, I see it every day first hand. I don't blame the bean-towners for migrating north to our fair state, becaasue it trully is an amazing place to live. I've tried to venture out, and alwasy find my way back home. I'm greatful that our town is getting the recognition it deserves . . .but at exactly what cost? With every new developer that comes in with a new project, the the quaintness that makes this town; the seclution that makes this state so hospitable dies a little bit.

I used to be on board. I mean, the Hotel business is my business, and I love it. It's so much fun to meet the travelers and visitors, and show them a good time, and what makes my town so much fun (even with a last call of 1:00 a.m.). When the Port Walk was announced, I thought it was great . . . and still do. . . at least the original idea. I was working for that company at the time of the announcement. Not only would the project create more jobs, but it was a project that went so far beyond just a new hote, not that we NEED another hotel in this town, and the project would have been cheaper without it, but hey, what do I know? I was just born and raised here. Though, it was an excuse to get rid of the parade mall, which I'm sorry, just had to go.

Most importantly you felt like these people actually cared about the people of this town, and not just the tourists. But business is business, and with it comes dirty politics, and now the parade mall is becoming a corporate monster that no one will be able to control. It's all about numbers, and profit, when before it was about making portsmouth a better place to live, it is now making portsmouth a cool place to visit. But guess what . . . We, the people who still have to live here when the tourists all flock back to their nests still exist!

We're the ones who suffer when we talk about cutting $4million from our school budget. WE suffer when you tax us. Most LLC's wouldn't suffer from this this new tax . . . because most of them are the big Boston names, but the small local business owners WOULD still take a hit. and a big one. We have 98 Police officer's on the city pay roll . . . who will all be taking pay cuts. I used to think that number was too large, and still do really, but in an over populated town of over 20,000, a strong police force is necessary. Spend, Spend, Spend . . . it seems that's what we do best in this town. Market Square artwork, Childrens day, Market Square Day, those god-forsaken parking meters which almost everyone I know absolutely hates! (and I know a lot of people). Sometimes I feel like we, the townsmen and women, have no say about what happens here. Like the Boston Businessmen are running the show.

I welcome all visitors with open arms. I welcome all new-comers as well. . . but when you move here to start a new life, you must be ready to leave the old life behind. Don't tell a bar-owner his establishment HAS TO be non-smoking. Don't shoo the musician out of the square because he doesn't look like a backstreet boy. The only right it seems we have left, is that we don't HAVE TO buckle our seat-belts when we drive our cars. You all want to re-make Portsmouth into your own vision. . . . but what you don't realize is that Portsmouth was great before you got wind of it, and will continue to be great long after you leave. These developers, their projects were supposed to bring balance to the city's budget, and bring people in to ultimately spend their money. So why, with all these corporations paying in all these taxes to the city, are we talking about slashing budgets, and laying off our teachers, police officers, and other city-workers?

We don't need cell towers, and wirless access points, or malfunctioning parking-meters. We need teachers to guide our youth. We need a better education system so that parents aren't shipping their kids off to private schools, out of fear of a poor education. We need to give our fellow Puddledockers an even chance at starting their own American Dream. We need to propperly fund our public works, to keep the quality of life we hold so near and dear. We, the people, need to take back our town. . . before the Bean-town Takeover gets any worse. New Hampshire tends to pride itself on its individuality . . . well I pose this question to you granite staters: What Individuality?

Views: 41

Tags: Portsmouth

Comment

You need to be a member of Live Free or Die Alliance to add comments!

Join Live Free or Die Alliance

Comment by LFDA Editor on March 10, 2010 at 2:23pm
I have given considerable thought to this in the past year as the state commission on the death penalty hears evidence about death versus life imprisonment without possibility of parole as the punishment for the most heinous crimes.

Given our motto, Live Free or Die, it seems to me that if one is deprived of one’s liberty that that is the worst punishment possible, even worse than death.

Our Declaration of Independence speaks of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If one’s life is lived with no chance of ever enjoying liberty again, then each moment of each day is worse than death.

This strikes me as a potent reason for NH citizens in particular to support life imprisonment without possibility of parole as the ultimate punishment.

David Lamarre-Vincent
Comment by LFDA Editor on March 10, 2010 at 1:28pm
Our State Motto.

Live Free or Die. I fully embrace our State Motto because these are four of the most powerful words in the world. There have been other phrases that convey the same message but none more powerful or succinct. The issue I have is how the motto and the meaning are misused.

What angers me is the fact that the majority of the people, politicians, and organizations that frequently cite this phrase focus on the Live Free component when they disagree with proposed legislation and neglect to recognize the implicit concept of responsibility of the 'or Die' part.

Two examples of this are the seat belt issue and the motorcycle helmet issue that emerge every two years in our legislature. For starters, the parties that continually oppose these laws say that their rights are being abused. That is complete nonsense. As every teenager is taught in driver’s education, ‘Driving is a privilege, not a right.' There are several organizations that disagree with this assertion but the fact is you need a driver’s license to operate a motor vehicle in any state and the state has the authority to deny or revoke your license. Furthermore, there is nothing in the Bill of Rights or Constitution that says anyone has the right to drive a vehicle.

But more important is the notion of responsibility for one’s actions. That is the 'or Die' component of our motto. If a person chooses not to wear a motorcycle helmet because he believes it is his right, then he is also choosing to ignore the data that shows that wearing a helmet reduces head injuries. Following that logic through, means that he must accept all responsibility for taking care of himself if he is involved in an accident and suffers head injuries. In other words, when the emergency people respond to an accident and see a motorcyclist with a head injury who is not wearing a helmet, leave him there and let him take care of himself. Unfortunately this holds true whether the accident is his fault or not. I know that most cyclists have insurance and expect the insurance company to pay when they are in an accident. A suggested alternative is to have a question on the insurance application asking if the person wears a certified safety helmet. If they do, they can be charged a significantly lower rate than someone who does not. If they lie, which most will do once they figure out their premiums will be lower, their claim should be denied. The problem with this concept is that the medical expenses have already been incurred and the public will be stuck paying for it. So, I go back to my original premise, leave the person there and let them accept their responsibility and fend for themselves. I know this is harsh but that’s what the words or Die mean.

The same logic holds for those who oppose a mandatory seat belt law. What I find even more ludicrous about this issue are the statements, ‘It messes up my clothes’ or ‘I feel constricted and cannot move about’. Excuse me, I have worn suits to important meetings and worn my seat belt while driving there and arrived in tip top shape. I did use some common sense and removed the jacket while I was driving. As for the constricted and cannot move argument, where are you going? You are supposed to be focusing on driving the vehicle and you need to remain in your seat to do so.

So, if you want the freedom not to wear a motorcycle helmet or seat belt, accept the corresponding responsibility and Live Free or Die.

-Dallas Langevin

Follow us:

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Badge

Loading…

© 2012   Created by LFDA Editor.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service